Judicial hearing to determine if Stonecrest Councilmember Cobble must forfeit her seat after too many absences

Jazzmin Cobble
Testingfg of Ads











Stonecrest City officials have filed a declaratory judgment action to ask a superior court judge to decide whether Councilmember Jazzmin Cobble must vacate her seat because she missed too many City Council meetings last year, based on the city’s charter.

Four members of the City Council staged a protest and walked out of the City Council meeting on Feb. 10 after a motion failed to excuse Cobble’s absences retroactively. Due to the walkout, there was not a quorum to decide on several key issues including a vote on the bond deal through which the city would borrow the money needed to purchase the Sears building and the Sam’s building.

Cobble’s attendance came under scrutiny after citizens Saira Willingham and Michelle Emmanuel requested the 2019 attendance records for all City Council members. The requests from Willingham and Emmanuel were made on Jan. 20, according to emails obtained by On Common GroundNewsthrough Georgia’s open records laws.

Cobble, who represents District 3, was the youngest person elected to the city council at the time of her election in March 2017.

Under the city’s charter, Section 2.03 (a) states that a council person forfeits his or her office by “failing to attend one-third of the regular meetings of the council in a three-month period without being excused by the council.”

Cobble missed City Council meetings on Sept. 23 and Oct. 14, according to city records. Cobble told On Common Ground Newsthe absences were work related, but declined to discuss the matter further stating that her attorney would provide comment on her behalf at a later time.

After discovering that Cobble missed the allotted number of meetings, City Clerk Megan Reid said City Attorney Winston Denmark contacted Cobble by phone on Feb. 6 to notify her that she had missed two of six scheduled city council meetings during a three-month period in 2019, resulting into a forfeiture of her seat, according to the city charter.

Reid said on the same day, she, Attorney Tom Kurrie and Mayor Jason Lary met with the other four council members in pairs to discuss the matter. They held a 6:30 a.m. breakfast meeting with Councilmembers Tammy Grimes and Rob Turner at the I-HOP restaurant in Stonecrest. They met with Councilmembers Jimmy Clanton and George Turner at 11 a.m. at City Hall.

That afternoon, Councilmember George Turner requested a special called meeting to be held on Feb. 10 at 4:30 p.m. to vote the matters, listing two agenda items: “Excused absences” and “Withdrawal of lawsuit in the name of the city,” according to an email obtained by On Common Ground News.

Councilmember George Turner stated in the email that he had the support of Councilmembers Rob Turner and Tammy Grimes to hold the special called meeting. According to the city’s charter, Sec. 2.09.(e), “Special meetings of the city council may be held on the call of either the mayor and one  councilmember or three councilmembers.”

An intense debate took place at the special called meeting.  The council deadlocked 2-2 on Councilmember Rob Turner’s motion to retroactively excuse Cobble for the absences. Councilmember George Turner supported the motion. Mayor Lary and Councilmember Clanton voted against excusing the absences.

Grimes was not allowed to vote because she had not been elected and therefore could not retroactively excuse a councilmember’s absence and Cobble was the subject of the vote and therefore disqualified, city officials said in a statement.

Councilmember Rob Turner said during the special called meeting that although the council did not formally approve Cobble’s absences, he believed that the notifications from Cobble to the city clerk were sufficient “for an excused absence.” Cobble notified the city clerk by email concerning both of her absences.  The emails stated that Cobble would not be able to attend because of work, Reid said.

City Attorney Winston Denmark said, however, Cobble needed to have council’s approval for the absences to be excused and that did not happen. He said the council could not legally retroactively excuse Cobble for the absences, even if there is some ambiguity in the charter.

“Regrettably, the charter does not expand on being excused by the council. It doesn’t say without being first excused by the council nor does it say that the council can, after the fact, excuse an absence. If it is the case that the charter causes a forfeiture in office upon missing a third of the meetings, or, under some set of circumstances, that forfeiture would occur by operation of law,” Denmark said. “It is my opinion that once the office has been forfeited, the council could not retroactively go back and excuse the absences.”

The mayor said that notifying the city clerk of an absence does not constitute an excused absence.

“The council must have taken action.  Someone would have to make a motion to excuse the absences and then a vote would have to occur.  This didn’t happen and therefore the absences are unexcused,” Mayor Lary said during the special called meeting.

In protest, George Turner, Rob Turner, Tammy Grimes and Cobble walked out of the regular council meeting following the special called meeting and work session. Shortly after the regular council meeting began at 7 p.m., the four left the dais one by one, bewildering the audience who had arrived for the meeting.

Clanton and Mayor Lary continued the council meeting, although they were only able to make special presentations because there was not a quorum to vote on city business. Following the presentations, he discussed what led to the walkout. He said a precedent for how the council must vote to excuse an   absence had been set when he announced in September 2018 that he was battling prostate cancer and asked the council’s permission to be absent.

“The only person that would excuse me was Councilman Jimmy Clanton. I got emails like ‘Well, should we pay him? How long does it take before he’s out of office? It was nothing with regard to what my plight was or what my wife’s plight is at this point,” said Lary.

Lary said he continued attending the City Council meetings because he could not get the council’s approval to be excused.

“Their action to ignore my request certifies that each councilmember, including Cobble, was aware that there had to be action taken by council to excuse any absences,” Lary said.

Lary and Rob Turner missed one council meeting in 2019, according to the city clerk’s records. Clanton and George Turner had perfect attendance, along with Diane Adoma, up until she resigned last year in an unsuccessful bid for the office of mayor.

Lary said in addition to the council meetings, Cobble also missed special called meetings during the same period last year.

The two special called meetings were: Oct. 3 and Oct. 23, according to city records.

Lary said he found it hard to believe that the council wanted to retro-actively excuse Cobble’s absences because of her full-time occupation.

“How do you not let a person off for cancer? It doesn’t matter that it’s Jason Lary or not. How do you not vote for that? How do you not do that when the person that is ill is asking to be excused? And then you turn around and somebody else is busy and they can’t fulfill their obligation to the electorate while still being paid by the city? And you’re going to retroactively vote for them to be absent? How fair is that? Lary said.

Clanton said he voted against excusing Cobble’s absence because voting for it would have meant changing the charter without proper protocol.

“We cannot on the fly change the charter to suit ourselves and our self-interests,” Clanton told the public during the City Council meeting.

The city council meetings are held twice a month. A work session is held before each council meeting. Stonecrest city council members earn $15,000 a year, receiving about $1,250 gross per month. The mayor receives $20,000 ($1,666.67 per month).




On Common Ground News


  • Dave Marcus

    February 13, 2020 at 11:46 pm

    Excellent writeup. Very glad to learn the timeline.


  • Faye Coffield

    February 14, 2020 at 10:45 am

    I will respond again to this posting as it appears my original reply was removed. I have serious questions as to why this matter was not handled in October when she missed the second meeting. It appears once again Stonecrest government failed to take appropriate action in a timely manner. Whoever dropped the ball in this matter, unless they are an elected official, should be terminated. If they are an elected official their name(s) should be made public.


  • Dr, Barbara Lee

    February 14, 2020 at 6:14 pm

    I am concerned about the dismissal. It appears that the charter speaks about a council person not being able to miss more than 2 days within a 3 month period. How many days did she miss and were they not met within the three months or are you looking at her total days absent during the year? If she met the requirement of no more than 2 days absent within a three month period, then she should be fine.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Testingfg of Ads

About us

On Common Ground News is published daily by On Common Ground, Inc (OCGNEWS.COM). The newspaper serves DeKalb, Gwinnett, Rockdale and Metro Atlanta.

The opinions expressed by writers and contributors are not necessarily those of the publisher or the newspaper’s advertisers.

No portion of this newspaper may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher.

We reserve the right to reject material and advertisements we deem inappropriate.

On Common Ground News
P.O. Box 904
Lithonia, GA 30058

(770) 679-5607


Latest News

Select list(s) to subscribe to

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: On Common Ground News, 1240 Sigman Road, Conyers, GA, 30012, http://www.ocgnews.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact